Positive Reinforcement Dog Training: What the Research Actually Shows
Quick Answers
Direct answer: The American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior has concluded, based on its review of the available research, that reward-based training methods should be used for all dog training, stating there is no evidence that aversive methods outperform reward-based approaches in any context, while aversive methods carry documented risks to welfare and the human-animal bond.
What AVSAB's position statement covers
AVSAB's statement on humane dog training directly addresses outdated dominance and "alpha" theories used to justify punishment-based corrections, concluding that these concepts do not reflect current scientific understanding of dog behavior.
Documented risks of aversive methods
The American Veterinary Medical Association has highlighted that aversive tools -- shock collars, prong collars, choke chains -- are associated with increased fear, anxiety, and in some cases redirected aggression, along with a weaker bond between dog and owner compared to reward-based training.
Professional consensus
AVSAB's position joins similar statements from the Pet Professional Guild and the American Animal Hospital Association, reflecting a broad professional consensus that has strengthened over the past decade as more behavior research has accumulated.
What this means practically
For everyday behavior problems -- barking, pulling, jumping, digging -- this research supports starting with reward-based methods first, identifying the root cause of the behavior, and building an alternative behavior through reinforcement rather than suppressing the symptom through discomfort.
See how this research-backed approach applies to your dog's specific issue with the Natural Behavior Decoder.